Felix Seres vs Roman Glarner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• What percentage of second serve points has Seres won in the last six months? Seres has not won any second serve points, while Glarner has secured 44.86% of them, indicating a stronger second serve performance.
• Regarding return games, Glarner has won nearly 49.54% of their opponent's second serve points, a significant contrast to Seres's 0% win rate, showcasing Glarner's superior return capabilities.
• Seres's breakpoint-saving ability stands at 0%, while Glarner's is at 48.48%, demonstrating better performance under pressure by Glarner.
• Over the past year, Seres has a perfect match record, winning all 2 matches played. In contrast, Glarner has a 50% win rate, suggesting overall consistency for Seres but against lower-ranked opponents.
• On surfaces, both players excel on clay, with Seres having a flawless clay record, although against fewer opponents, whereas Glarner has a 58% win rate on clay.
• Seres has participated mostly in $10K ITF events, winning 100% of their matches, while Glarner has split their matches evenly between wins and losses.
• The average rank of Seres's opponents is notably unranked, compared to Glarner's opponents who average a rank of 52.13, providing Glarner with more exposure to competitive play.
• In deciding set scenarios, Seres has been victorious in 100% of such instances, whereas Glarner has a 40% success rate, highlighting Seres’s ability to close matches under pressure.
• Which player is better at converting break points recently? Seres has not converted any break points, while Glarner maintains a 32% conversion rate, giving Glarner an edge in exploiting breakpoint opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):

Examining the recent performances and statistics of Seres and Glarner highlights distinct differences in their game execution. Glarner consistently excels in both second serve performance and return games compared to Seres's zero percent success rate in these areas. This demonstrates Glarner's stronger baseline game and ability to win more points during rallies.

Pressure situations also heavily favor Glarner, with an effective 48.48% breakpoint-saving ability versus Seres's inability to save breakpoints. Despite Seres’s perfect match record, the quality of opponents faced by Glarner has been considerably higher, providing Glarner with more opportunities to adapt and hone their skills against tougher competition.

While Seres performs commendably in deciding set scenarios, Glarner's superior breakpoint conversion and overall experience against higher-ranked players position them as the more tactically prepared individual for tough match play.

Consequently, based on the factual analysis, Glarner is the likely winner of the forthcoming match given their stronger recent form and competitive edge in critical performance metrics.